Tuesday, July 7, 2009

San Jose's Understaffed Police Department

By Ed Rast

Did you know that San Jose in 2005 had the lowest ratios of sworn and civilian police per resident of the 23 U.S. cities with populations between 500,000 and 1 million?

At the time, San Jose had only 1.48 sworn officers and 0.40 civilian staff per 1,000 residents while the average of those 23 large cities was 2.64 sworn officers and 0.72 civilian staff per 1,000 residents.

Mayor Gonzales in his 2006-2007 budget message directed the San Jose Police Department to prepare a Five-Year Staffing Plan to close that gap and deliver to the community the high-quality, innovative, and efficient police services we have come to expect.

It was estimated in 2005 that 597.5 additional personnel were needed — including 332 sworn patrol officers, 146 sworn staff in investigative, preventative and administrative positions, and 119.5 civilian staff. But this would still not bring San Jose to the 23-city staffing average.

Unfortunately, San Jose’s sworn and civilian police ratios have only gotten worse. To date, the City has added only 40 new staff of the 597 proposed in the five-year plan. A proposed addition of 25 officers in FY 2009-10 went unfunded. Meanwhile, our population continues to grow, and the police workload right along with it.

SJPD’s understaffing problems began with an economic downturn in 2001 and continued through eight straight years of budget deficits. For four of those years, there were no staffing increases to offset increases in population, development, service calls and administrative workload.

Officers were shifted from proactive prevention activities and community policing to primarily reactive Patrol Division calls for service. Limited investigative personnel gave priority to crimes against persons.

This shift in priorities resulted in significant increases in auto theft (111%) and burglary ( 52%) from 2000-2005. Increasing property crimes — as predicted — jeopardized San Jose’s “Safest Big City in America” status.

Staffing reductions in 2005 nearly brought the SJPD back to 1998 levels (1,343). But between 1998 and 2005, San Jose’s population grew 10% to 910,528. That’s an increase equal to an entire council district.

As estimated by the California Department of Finance, San Jose’s population increased 10.6% (or 111,949 residents) from 894,943 in the 2000 census to 1,006,892 in January of 2008 — two years ahead of an estimate by the Association of Bay Area Governments.

The long and the short of the story is this: We need more police, and we need them now.

Many residents do not understand how adding new officers, staff and improved technology like a proposed computerized records system as well as increasing — not decreasing — community policing activities can help our understaffed police department prevent, investigate, and solve crimes.

If you’d like to get a better idea for yourself, have a look at SJPD’s proposed Five-Year Staffing Plan for 2007-12. Police and staff comparison charts can be found in graphics 9 and 10 (or pdf pages 16-17).

Next week, we’ll compare San Jose’s police staffing and crime rates to local cities. Enjoy the summer with your family and friends.

8 comments:

  1. Good to know somebody out there is keeping score. This is a game we can't afford to lose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...and now that San Jose is annexing more county land, I'm sure those ratios of offiers to citizens will dip below 2005 levels.

    That also means officers will be taking more risks to "clear" calls by themselves in order to attempt to maintian the quality customer service that the residents of SJ demand and deserve.

    Officers don't need to sacrafice their safety just to provide service...the Mayor and council members need to listen up! All it takes is 1 officer lost to drive that point home, and hopefully it will never come to that.

    Stay safe!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ed,
    Thank you for making it clear through your article just how understaffed our Police Department is, and has been for over 8 years now. With the increase in our population, early release of criminals from state prisons, and local jails, along with gang activity on the rise, we need more Police Officers. It is a real shame that public safety has not been a top priority in San Jose. I guess denial isn’t just a river in Egypt.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just how bad does it have get before the city council starts to do something! Stop paying lip service to special interest groups and do your jobs. Maybe we should have a festival that we can't afford. Or better yet commission more art for the airport or some other stupid location

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stand by to standby. With the early release of 2,400 prisoners from the state prison. (San Quinten,Folsom etc.)As proposed by Arnold S. we will be in a world of trouble. They (prisoners) are considered low risk. That is pretty funny considering for every one hundred felony arrest maybe only 5 go to prison. With the proposed cut backs to the police what are they going to do. Maybe Deb. Figgone will cut the SJPD burglary unit by 50%. That will bring the unit to 1.5. A million people in the city and a burglary unit of 3. I get it now! See no evil, Hear no evil, Say no evil. That accounts for the 3 investigators. I wonder if Deb lives in SJ? Wonder how she would react to Sorry mam your worldly possesions are gone. We do not have the officers to investigate your case.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just to clarify; SJPD has 7 Burglary detectives... still ridiculous for the amount of crime they are tasked to deal with.

    ReplyDelete
  7. For the above Anonymous posted at 7:50 Am this information was given to me over the phone. Im sorry. How many cases get reported each year and could you post what the number would be for your officers. How many are filed on? How many are convicted. You sound like you may have those stats. What is the average conviction time for a burglar convicted in San Jose. I was a victim, and was told it was unworkable due to staffing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. In response to Anonymous above, PRA allows you to ask those questions you ask in the last post, but just so you know the reason your "crime" is not investigated has to do with taking officers from the Bureau of Investigation and putting them back in patrol. Citizens want someone responding when the first call comes in, but don't think about the latter half. Most of the reports filed for car clout, vandalism, so called petty crimes are filed for no more than insurance claims. As for conviction rates, ask for a PRA request from the Santa Clara County District Attorney, but if someone is caught for the 2nd time and there is time served previously they "can" be charged for a felony on the subsequent offense. Bear in mind, what the officer files on his report and what the DA's office chooses to file on is out of the PD's hands.

    ReplyDelete